Money Doesn’t Lie: Fitzy Struggling While Kasich Surges

Earlier in the week, Nick painted a picture of what to expect for today’s campaign finance filing deadline.  Gauging from past filings, it seemed that $500,000 raised on Eddy FitzJerrold’s side of things would be a decent starting point for his upstart campaign.  Or at least, that’s the bar he set for himself.

And was still trying to get there today… In a big way:


Not only did Fitzy send out this final plea for campaign cash, he had to take a huge sum of money from the Ohio Democratic Party at the 11th Hour to get over that bar.  But let’s start at the beginning.

July 31, 2013, is the deadline to report all campaign finance happenings from January 1, 2013, through June 30, 2013; however, any campaign may voluntarily disclose campaign filings up to the day of the filing.  And earlier this week, when Fitzy “won” the endorsement of Ohio’s failed Governor Ted Strickland, the bumbling recession governor said that a report of $500,000 raised would be a good start for the upstart gubernatorial candidate.

As for Wednesday’s fundraising totals, Strickland said if FitzGerald was “in that ballpark, somewhere” of $500,000 — roughly what Kasich had at this point in 2009 — he will have shown he’s gathered support.

This is not the first time Ed’s campaign has put that number out there. He mentioned it in an interview with Jim Heath recently as well. He’s doing his best to manage expectations about what their numbers are going to be. They really want to use Kasich’s 2009 numbers as a baseline.

Of course, as Nick explained, there’s a lot more to Kasich’s 2009 baseline than Fitzy wants you to know, like Fitzy declared earlier, allowing for more time to raise campaign dollars.

So when the numbers hit today, sure enough, Fitzy hit the mark he’d put out there, having raised over $600,000 and reporting over $540,000 cash on hand.  But the data behind the numbers show some serious cause for concern in Fitzy’s camp, not the least of which is this:


Here’s a helpful tip to Fitzy’s campaign: when a Capitol Square reporter is surprised by a blatant attempt to inflate a candidate’s finance numbers, you’re doing it wrong.

This last-minute contribution not only put Fitzy over the top of his $500,000 goal (and by a good chunk, admittedly), it accounted for nearly 20% of everything Fitzy raised since January.  And it was voluntarily reported to help inflate his dismal fundraising numbers from January through June.

In fact, of the $600,494 raised overall, only 43% was taken in during the mandatory reporting period of January through June, accounting for just $259,772.  That’s half of the $500,000 bar Fitzy & Strickland placed on this campaign.  Without the voluntary disclosure of July’s contributions, Fitzy’s report would be beyond laughable.  Heck, without the last three days, the report is a joke.

Since July 29th, Fitzy raised 43% of his total take.  That’s right: the money the party and other special interests poured into his campaign account in the last three days is equal to the amount he was able to raise on his own in the first six months of the year.

As a conservative, I was hoping Fitzy’s numbers would be bad, but these numbers are down right embarrassing.

In his 2009 filing, Kasich relied on Ohio GOP money to the tune of $0, as in no cash contributions.  Kasich reported just over $500,000 through June (without artificially padding his totals with July numbers).  And he declared his candidacy in May, just 61 days before the disclosure deadline.

Fitzy took $120,000 from the party, and declared his candidacy in the first week of January.  And his numbers rely on a massive amount of contributions voluntarily reported from July.  All of this to arrive at a similar (albeit slightly larger) final total.

The one “highlight” for Fitzy comes from the fact that almost 94% of his contributions came from Ohioans.  Yet, even that is a double-edged sword for Public Official 14.  As any politico will tell you, the race for Ohio’s Governor is a national campaign, and Democrats can’t win anything without big out-of-state dollars from Big Labor, like the AFL-CIO and the national teachers unions, who have the ability to steal massive amounts of money from their members and funnel it into political campaigns.

Though these numbers might suggest that Fitzy looks like a homegrown candidate, without big dollar national groups coming to his aid, he’s dead in the water.  And so far, they’re staying on the sidelines with many of Ohio’s biggest Democrat allies.  In his first campaign filing of the 2006 cycle, Ted Strickland received contributions from over 25 different union groups.  To date, Fitzy has received contributions from no more than 7.  Of course, if you’re an avid reader here, there’s no need to wonder why unions are no fan of Eddy Fitz.

All of this adds up to a major issue for Ed Fitzgerald that we pointed out months ago: he has a big, green problem.  And he’s going up against an incumbent that not only has favorable poll numbers, but is also exceeding all financial expectations.

Kasich raised nearly $2.6 million, from January to June—without padding his stats with the July fundraising numbers.  That’s on par with what Strickland pulled down in July 2009, but without the dozens of out-of-state fundraising trips (of course, that’s where liberal money is, so where else was he to go?).  In addition, contributions from non-individuals (i.e. PAC’s) amounted to just over 7% of Kasich’s total contributions.  That’s in stark contrast to Fitzy’s 30%, or even Strickland’s 17% (2009) from PAC’s.

And Kasich took in nearly 2,000 low-dollar donations (contributions of $100 or less).  That’s some serious grassroots support this far out of the November 2014 election.  Strickland took in around 1,400 such donations, and Fitzy pulled less than 1,100.  Perhaps Fitzy’s less-than-enthusiastic support at rallies across the state is reflected in his ability to fundraise.  Just maybe.

As the Cleveland Plain Dealer said earlier today, it’s difficult to draw true apples to apples comparisons for all these facts and figures; however, it’s easy to see what stands out from today’s campaign finance filings:

(1) Fitzy needed to voluntarily report all of July AND a huge last minute influx of ODP cash to make his financials look remotely acceptable.

(2) In all measurable categories, Kasich is on par with, or doing better than expected this far from Election Day 2014.

Combine those two facts with recent polling showing that 3 out of 4 Ohioans have no idea who Eddy Fitzgerald even is, and he’s got a lot of work to do with very minimal resources to do it.  And that’s not just my opinion.  Ask Stu Rothenberg, or Nate Silver.

There’s still a lot of time between now and next November, but the money doesn’t lie.  Fitzy is struggling and Kasich is surging ahead.  I won’t make any predictions, but if Eddy wants to keep this thing close next year, perhaps it’s time he put down the Facebook.

Author: Jake3BP

Formerly GOHP Blog, now Jake3BP. Working to present a unique, conservative perspective on politics in the state and throughout the nation. Just a regular working Joe, bringing you in depth and engaging discussion on the issues affecting our state and nation.

13 thoughts on “Money Doesn’t Lie: Fitzy Struggling While Kasich Surges”

  1. Um, Kasich’s report shows he received more money from the Ohio Republican State Central & Executive Committee Fund over this reporting period than you blast FitzGerald taking from the party.

    Don’t hear you guys saying a peep about the ORP pumping $250k into Josh Mandel’s campaign in a donation it made today.

    FitzGerald still reported raising more money than any gubernatorial challenger (Democratic or Republican) in Ohio history. You can quibble about sources of funds all you want. He’s got more in the bank that Kasich did in 2009 and that’s what matters.

    Kasich’s poll numbers are so impressive, Rothenberg rates it as only a tossup/tilt R. That’s basically what most incumbent races start as. Regardless, his numbers will drop the more Ohioans come to realize that Ohio is 47th in job growth and unemployment rate hasn’t moved in over a year.

    FitzGerald reported only 300 fewer small donors than Strickland did as an incumbent and 900 as Kasich now. Seriously, you think that shows a problem for a guy who just announced in an election 16 months out? Really? You believe that? Be honest. Kasich has kept his campaign running nonstop since the last election as evidenced by his campaign website, campaign Facebook page, etc. Republicans almost always do better fundraising than Democrats, same thing with incumbents. $ doesn’t equal victory this early out. Can FitzGerald have a strong campaign with this start. Absolutely. Can Kasich continue this pace? Probably not. Many of his donors are already maxed out.

    At this point four years ago, 66% said the same thing of John Kasich. He still won. Yes, Kasich has about a $300k better advantage over FitzGerald over where Strickland was four years ago. Is that enough to make a difference? I wouldn’t bet on it just yet, if I were you. If I recall, you predicted Romney and Issue 2 were going to win, too.

  2. How shocking that the ORP would contributing to their incumbent governor!! Wow Modern, you showed us!!

    The fair comparison is Fitz as a challenger versus when Kasich was a challenger in 2009 in their first reporting periods. Even Eddy put that out there.

    And he underperformed compared to Kasich by a HUGE margin. Kasich raised over $500,000 in just 61 days without ORP help. Fitz couldn’t even match that in 143 days!!

    The enthusiasm behind Fitz is dead compared to Kasich in 2009.

    But by all means, keep talking about Mandel in a post about the governor’s race.

    1. Um, Nick, Kasich was a former Congressional Budget Chairman, Fox News host, former Presidential candidate, and was connected to large investment political donors through his job at Lehman Brothers. And you can’t dismiss the ORP for supporting its gubernatorial candidate while blasting the Democrats for doing the same. Kasich also had Recharge Ohio, a PAC he used as an exploratory committee for years before announcing.

      Even if you take the donation from the ODP out, FitzGerald still came just under what Kasich rose. It’s impressive. However you slice it, it’s either THE strongest start of a gubernatorial challenger in modern Ohio history or the second one.

      But, by all means, please proceed, guy who was saying the early vote meant Romney already had Ohio in the bag.

  3. Modern “Kasich will lose by 20 points” Esquire.

    Did your lucrative law career that kept you out of politics slow down or did you get fired?

    1. Thanks for asking. I’m sure it’s because you care about me personally. I very much loved working at Vorys and it’s a great firm. However, the travel did get rather difficult for me as I have a young family and politics is my stronger passion, so I’ve been transiting away from law to politics.

Comments are closed.